Allan S. Lolly & Your VISA Fears Come True?

Bucharest Expat realizes that quite a few of you out there, whether from the US, or elsewhere have fallen in love with, began a relationship with, and possibly even married a Romanian. Because of these “circumstances” as we’ll call it, you, at some point, will be going down the “immigration” road. Unless you yourself will be laying permanent ground in Romania you’ll need to seek a Visa of some sort for your new partner.

There are multiple was to do this, each with a unique set of pros and cons. Lately we have had discussions with many people, from all walks of life, with experiences that seem to be oddly consistent.

Do you do the leg work yourself or hire an attorney?

The answer is it depends.

Doing the legwork yourself can be a tedious process in which you will have to “learn the ropes” as you go. You will save the money you have spent on hiring an attorney, however your cost of learning may or may not offset that initial retainer. When doing the legwork yourself, you may also “hire” a local representative that can assist in pointing you in the right direction. Start at your consulate both in person in your local area and on the web. Each country offers a complete or near complete package of immigration information on their consulate websites, of which you can download, print up, and walk (documents in hand) to your nearest consulate and speak with someone who can walk you through what it is you have in your hand.

Hiring an attorney is something you must really do some homework on before hand. It is best to work with someone that comes highly recommended by someone you trust, or is someone you have worked with in the past, as immigration is something to be taken very seriously! Best bet?… Hire 2 attorneys… one to work on your visa, the other to make sure your attorney is working on your visa.

The best advice we can offer?? Stay away from immigration attorneys that advertise heavily on the web, as these companies may not be who or what they say. Remember this is not a fact, nor our we attorneys.. this is simply our OPINION. There are enough “bad apples” out there that you may wish to just pursue a route away from the web altogether.

Here is the story of a fellow expat that may help you protect yourself in the future:

My wife and I met in Bucharest over 3 years ago, and almost immediately married in Bucharest. Soon thereafter we began the pursuit of her visa into the US via an online company that appears to have a couple of names. Those names are Fiancee Visas, and/or Allan S. Lolly and associates. Allan S. Lolly is the named partner representing this firm Fiancee Visas that specializes in immigration. When you google “Fiancee Visas” or combinations of those words you will inevitably see 1-800-fianceevisas, Fiancee Visas, or Allan S. Lolly and associates, so naturally, we called them, compared some rates, and decided to foot the bill to proceed forward.

Soon after, we received our “welcome” package, which of course included a list of all the documents we will need to include in our return package in order for a proper submission to the government of the US and so forth for my wife’s visa.

We completed the package, and “fedex’d” it out to our case manager, or paralegal, assigned to our case. We were off and running… or so we thought.

After a couple of days, we received confirmation that our package was received and we were good to go. I had qualified with flying colors to be my wife’s “sponsor” into the US, and we should have our interview in the not to distant future.

Then it began… after a while we received communication from our “new” case worker at Allan S. Lolly law firm, that introduced themselves and informed us they would be handling our case from here on out. No clue why this happened but we went with it. This new caseworker then proceeded to ask us for additional documentation… documentation she had yet to “receive”. Funny thing was, we had already submitted some of this information (copies of passports included) to the prior caseworker. Wonder what happened to our important, not to mention confidential, documentation? We questioned the necessity of this re-submission of information, stalled a little to do some research, and ultimately resubmitted it via email this time (which took some persuasion to do as some docs required our original signature). So the caseworker had what she needed and now we were good to go… again.

Time for a third caseworker from Allan S. Lolly to introduce themselves to us and our case. This time the request for more documents threw up a lott of red flags, and my wife and I had our first “sinking” feeling, as we now realized we were in the middle of “being had”. We paid them their money already… we now became someone to “deal” with rather than a client. The person becomes a number. Suffice to say, we did not continue to submit “further documentation” as we were now putting ourselves at risk.

Additionally, this period of “caseworker transition” caused such long and inappropriate delays, that I was forced to relocate near permanently to Romania to be with my new family. Any reasonable person would do the same. In doing so, and amidst the economic crisis, it was necessary for me to “close up shop” and cut my losses with a real estate business in the US. This (over a year into the Visa Process) caused me to no longer meet the USA’s financial requirements to be my own wife’s sponsor into the US. Thank you Allan S. Lolly for not doing your job when you had the opportunity! Allan S. Lolly did apologize for the delays in some emails, stating that it was indeed unacceptable delays, and he even offered to pay for the DHL costs to send yet another package of docs from Bucharest this time. Thanks a bunch.

It was not too long after these “switcheroos” that I became somewhat more “forceful” in my demands that they treat me as a client, which means responding to emails in a timely fashion, locating the documents that I said I had submitted, and answering my questions instead of answering questions they “thought” I asked. Time went by and still nothing except apology letters that passively put the blame on us, as well as excuses of why the caseworkers at Allan S. Lolly were not answering my emails. They were out of the office at the time as it stated on their outgoing auto-reply messages. How convenient.

Finally, we had had enough, we had gotten nowhere with this firm. We had the slight indication that they may have filed some paperwork to immigration on our behalf (a strange forwarded “receipt” email) which is disappointing because the lack of proper communication and their prior loss of our docs insured they could not have submitted a complete package. Or could they have? We’ll never know. We finally asked Allan S. Lolly and his firm for a refund of our hard earned money that we paid for this “service”.

After many emails over yet another 2 month period in which we asked for a refund, the response and communication seemed to pick up pace a bit. But no mention of the refund… just how we could be “satisfied” as customers. This included the passive apologies, including throwing the paralegals “under the bus” as well as Allan’s “personal” attention to our matter, where he would review our case. Good. We needed our case reviewed. Its About time. During this “review” of our case, Mr. Lolly replied to us in emails where he stated that everything should be squared away and again, an apology, and that if I had any delays in dealing with my caseworker to contact him personally. Of course he doesn’t pick up his phone. Well, as they had completely dodged my request for a refund, I pushed harder. Finally this story came to a head this month when Allan S. Lolly forwarded me an email his bookkeeper had emailed him that stated their firm had issued me a refund already back in October! Neither my wife and I nor Allan S. Lolly were aware that this refund had taken place. To make matters worse, this “surprise” refund was issued to a debit card that had been cancelled years prior, and was also tied to a closed bank account! Are there still companies out there that don’t re-confirm a financial transaction with customers prior to making said transaction? Apparently.. yes.

My wife and I were outraged. They just gave our money to a bank, that no surprise, was more than happy to accept the transaction. Now Allan S. Lolly has essentially handed our refund to a perfect stranger. I sent off another series of complaint emails, attempting to get them to “step up to the plate” and take responsibility, and issue my refund TO ME, however the best they could do was reinforce the fact that they had already issued a refund to some random bank that, because I used to bank with them 2 and a half years prior was reason enough to wash their hands in any responsible. Allan S. Lolly graciously offered to let me call this bank (whom let me reiterate again I am not a customer of) and sort out his firms problem.

So up to this point, I have been aggressively working very hard on the internet on the Better Business Bureau, consumer protection agencies, any blog and forums I can find to let every person know what Allan S. Lolly deems is adequate customer care. I still have no refund nor do they consider me and my wife a client that is worthy of any customer care. Beware.

So in summary, we hope that you get an understanding of some of the nightmares you may encounter along your journey to bring a spouse or fiancee back to the US, Canada, wherever it may be as a legal citizen. The above testimonial is not the opinion of Bucharest Expat, it is only the testimonial of one of our readers. Remember, the information on here is not necessarily fact, only opinion. Not all experiences are bad, nor is Bucharest Expat an attorney. The best way to find someone qualified to assist with your visa concerns? Word of mouth. If you hear something negative… err on the side of caution and steer clear!

Incoming search terms:

  • Allan Lolly
  • allan s lolly
  • allan s lolly reviews
  • allan lolly reviews
  • allan lolly attorney reviews
  • allan lolly and associates complaints
  • allan lolly and associates
  • reviews Allan lolly immigration bad
  • allan lolly complaint
  • allen lolly

No related posts.

  • Mummy

    This is indeed a sad experience and I think that Allan S. Lolly firm should be included in the ripoff report to alert others. Before I make deals with firms that I encounter online, I always google check them for comments or reports. The negatives and positives always show.

  • http://www.bucharestexpat.com Bucharest Expat

    If you must look online for detailed information on which visa attorneys to use, begin by using the attorneys name or lawfirms’ name and add “complaints” to the end (example: Allan S. Lolly & Associates Complaints) you will be amazed at how efficient this is at sorting your “list” for you!

  • http://www.bettercareconsulting.com Aliscot

    I had actually just found Allan S. Lolly and Associates on the web but changed my mind in hiring them thanks to your post that appeared next to them in Google – Thanks for the heads up!
    gracias

  • http://www.facebook.com/tcbrei Trevor Barzee

    Just a footnote – after having a dispute go “unresolved” and having frustrations mount due to the fact that we only wish to a) obtain a visa, or b) obtain a refund, we noticed that Allan S. Lolly seems to show a pattern around the internet. He never seems to acknowledge his grateful customers (yes apparently there are satisfied customers… wish we could be one of them) however he only seems to become highly defensive against his dissatisfied customers. As a professional firm wouldn’t you attempt to satisfy your unsatisfied customers? It seems childish for his firm to go these routes:

    http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/92037-ca-allan-lolly-199407/reviews.html#87087

    http://ratepoint.com/dispute/118125ac1194699987addf58ab70cd1f/show

  • Bob

    Just searched on this lawfirm… funny you should mention them. They come up front page in Google, but so does your testimonial! You’re right it is better to steer clear and save myself and my fiancee from any potential pitfalls BEFORE they occur. Thanks for the article… always a pleasure.

  • http://cbledsoeblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/30/allan-s-lolly-your-visa-fears-come-true-bucharest-expat/ Allan S. Lolly & Your VISA Fears Come True? – Bucharest Expat | cbledsoeblog

    [...] The answer is it depends. via bucharestexpat.com [...]

  • KitKatt

    My favorite line from the whole article:

    Hire 2 attorneys… one to work on your visa, the other to make sure your attorney is working on your visa.

    Ain’t it the truth! It’s a sad state of affairs, but that is what the world has come to.

  • Programmer

    Hello All,
    I am the programmer for Mr. Lolly and a former K1 client. I can give you the absolute truth regarding this business. Allan is the hardest working person I’ve ever met. He often goes way above and beyond what is necessary. He also knows more about family visas than anybody else doing them. Here are the facts…
    1) 99.4% (true percentage) of the people not getting their visas brought it upon themselves. Either they did not follow the directions they were given, did not supply their documents on time, misrepresented themselves (LIED), or my personal favorite… wanted to get out of their relationship and lied to their partner about what really happened. Then they point the blame on the attorney and to prove how innocent they are, they start shooting their mouths off publicly.
    2) Mr. Lolly can not get everybody a visa. But the fact is, if he isn’t sure he can do it as it’s presented to him, he doesn’t take the case. He does not take clients just to make a buck.
    3) Until recently the company was a partnership under a different name. People talk about Allan because he is always there working. However, the partnership ended. This I can’t talk about, but I can tell you that the best people are still with Allan S. Lolly & Assoc.
    4) It’s ignorant to believe something about a company just because a few people out of several thousand say something negative.

  • http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110102102459AAAQlN6 Trevor

    Programmer – It is good that you are friends with Mr. Lolly and vouch for him. I have many friends that will vouch for me also. It is good to finally here the absolute truth about this business, that is so reassuring. I also don’t question his knowledge related to family visas, I simply put in to question his business practices and the way he handles his customers (yes there are many unhappy customers out there with similar issues). In regards to point number 1, those are interesting figures. Thank You for the information, that is good for people to know. 2. Mr. Lolly took our case, as you say, because he believed he could get the visa. I don’t doubt this. If you re-read my issue it in know way points to an intent to “defraud” me or whatever you may call it. But at the end of the day he also takes cases to “make a buck”, as I would imagine he has bills to pay like the rest of us. 3. Yeah they switched names during my process once or twice, you are absolutely correct, I should have noticed that as a big red flag. Thank You for letting everyone know, as internal issues typically do trickle down to the customers; the ones who may pay the final price. 4.I agree as well, for instance I still fly with certain airlines even though they lose my luggage a few times! What people are taking home on this point though, is that when searching for immigration attorneys, it is, based on my story and others, better to steer clear of Allan Lolly, Allan Lolly and Associates, 1-800-USA-Immigration, or Holmes & Lolly, whatever their name may happen to be today. Getting a Visa is an extremely important “event” and shouldn’t be taken lightly. In this case it is better to be safe than sorry. Seek competent council.

    I am still awaiting my refund, as I have not received it yet, and he has also “fired” me as a client. I will continue sharing my story with those who will listen! Thank You for your feedback on my issue.

  • http://extremetraveler.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/allan-s-lolly-your-visa-fears-come-true-bucharest-expat/ Allan S. Lolly & Your VISA Fears Come True? – Bucharest Expat | extremetraveler

    [...] Allan S. Lolly & Your VISA Fears Come True? – Bucharest Expat Posted on January 18, 2011 by extremetraveler Programmer – It is good that you are friends with Mr. Lolly and vouch for him. I have many friends that will vouch for me also. It is good to finally here the absolute truth about this business, that is so reassuring. I also don’t question his knowledge related to family visas, I simply put in to question his business practices and the way he handles his customers (yes there are many unhappy customers out there with similar issues) via bucharestexpat.com [...]

  • http://www.squidoo.com/immigration-visas Mrdocstevens

    Trevor, I have now noticed your post on here, as I have been doing quite a lot of research on this topic lately. Not knowing the details of your case aside from the vague description above and below, I can only assume that you wish to continue forward in seeking resolution to your concern. Please contact the Bar Association in the State in which this firm is licensed. Trevor, let me ask you, have you contacted the States’ Attorney General as well as the Better Business Bureau regarding this matter? They will not go out of there way to help, however this is a starting point. It is also my recommendation that you do NOT under any circumstances allow yourself to be intimidated into backing down if you truly have been wronged. It is common in situations similar to this for clients to feel somewhat uneasy during the act of holding their attorneys accountable for their actions (or services). I have been down this road before, and let me tell you, bad publicity travels one-hundred times faster than good publicity, so continuing to share your story (while remaining truthful) is the best thing you can do. As I am sure you have already noticed, there are many, many clients of Allan S. Lolly’s (Holmes & Lolly, you are correct they seem to change their name and location quite a lot) that have had similar issues as you. Here are some links that may help you along your journey, and you may wish to get in touch with these people and begin a dialogue:

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110102102459AAAQlN6

    http://forum.fiance.com/forum2.asp?Main=ShowTopic&topicid=1233&page=3

    http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=87403

    http://www.laborlawtalk.com/showthread.php?t=24608&page=1

    http://www.russianmeetingplace.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7217

    here is my article at:
    http://www.squidoo.com/immigration-visas

    Feel free to contact me at any time, my email address is as follows:
    mrdocstevens@hotmail.com

  • Pattycatwoman

    Looks like there is more than just a few people when you search online! Either way, a company only has to screw just one person in order to show their true colours. I am sure I can speak for the 3,000 plus people in this community and the many thousands more in others when I say Better Safe Than Sorry! Allan Lolly looks like a swindler to me!

  • Bhssinclair

    Interesting thing: Mr. Lolly took your case thinking he could do it yet you had to continue sending documents? What information did he view when he made the decision to take your case? I smell fish as well Trevor…

  • epetrova

    Wow.. “programmer” you are a client and the computer guy for Allan Lolly? Who else at this firm has knowledge regarding the details of cases? The janitor? The window washer? OMG what ever happened to confidentiality? I have a friend in Moscow that has actually heard of your company… they handle Russian matchmaking…looks like I’ve got some new info to share now!

  • Programmer

    Please note that I never said I accessed any client information.
    Nor am I “the computer guy”. I am a security cleared programmer with 34 years of experience.
    Neither the janitor, window washer, nor I have access to any personal documents.

  • Programmer

    I agree that people should use Google to check out comments, reports, and any other feedback before doing business with anybody online. However, people should also consider that most people that use a company online successfully don’t go running around posting praises while the few that have a bad experience will run around posting everywhere.
    Just look below. Mrdocstevens had a bad experience and posted in at least the 6 places he listed. If just 100 people did that, there would be 6,000 negative posts about a company that has served more than 11,000 people.
    I refer you to the Occam’s Razor in this situation. Isn’t it much more plausible that 100 out of 11,000 people caused their own problems?

    And that alone is enough for me to disagree with your assessment that there should be a ripoff report filed.

  • Programmer

    So in short, you’re claiming that your contract was broken and you are going to continue to attempt to damage the companies reputation.
    If what you are saying is true, then why haven’t you just hired an attorney to represent you about that?
    It’s easy to do and you only have to pay the attorney if you lose the case.

    I’m not a lawyer, but I do believe that choosing to discuss this in a public forum invites the other party to respond in the same public forum about your situation.

    And upon rereading your original story, I notice that you stated a refund was issued. You stated that the refund was given to you on a card that was “canceled years prior”.
    I’m very curious about one thing… Did the company pick a number out of a hat that just happened to belong to you years prior?

    To all the people reading this:
    Please be careful of what you believe on the internet.
    Hear what everybody has to say, but always think for yourselves.

  • Theshoemann

    I noticed this post here on Avvo thinking it could help you, but looks like you’ve already hit this place? http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/92037-ca-allan-lolly-199407/reviews.html#91238 It seems interesting in that it looks like the praises on their may be generic “fake” testimonials used to boost a ranking…. who knows….

  • Trevor

    Reputation is what it is. It is either good or bad. The companies’ actions dictate what their “reputation” is. I am merely relaying to EVERYBODY I can the truth about what my experiences with this company have been in order to help them make a more informed decision with their immigration matters.

    I agree with you, people should not believe everything they read on the internet. One should do their due diligence, which in the case of Allan Lolly will turn up not just my complaint, but many others as well. If I had done proper due diligence as you promote, I would have chosen another firm just to be “on the safe side”. Well hind sight is 20/20 as they say.

    You are correct, and I am glad to see you are understanding my experience with this firm. They [Allan] claim to have issued a refund to a card I used to have at a Bank I used to bank with (the equivalent of throwing money out the window hoping I am there to catch it), however I have no way of knowing this as I have not done business with this bank for several years now. Funny thing is Allan was unaware of the refund until well after the refund was issued by his bookkeeper…lol.

    If a refund was not due to me (after Allan Lolly “reviewed” my case, apologizing for his firms incompetence, and attempting to rectify the situation) would one have been offered? Don’t think so. They made an error and neglected to gain up-to-date financial information to return payment and are now desperately trying to cover their tracks.

    I am considering the option of hiring an attorney(s) to pursue this and other substantial damages incurred as a result. An attorney will not take this on contingency as it is too “small” of a case.

  • Programmer

    I’m just going to number my responses to your paragraphs 1-5.

    1) That’s your version of the truth. Just because you say it doesn’t make it true. I have yet to see anything that backs up anything that you are saying.

    2) I’ve already explained how your version of due diligence is skewed by people like Mrdocstevens (below) who slammed Allan Lolly by posting in several places and even writing an article. If you read his article, he says he never used Allan Lolly but instead hired a through a close relation. He also has no profile attached to his article, wrote only one article for that site, and it was on the same day he registered there. I would say he skewed the results of somebodies due diligence, wouldn’t you?

    3) This isn’t even plausible. How would he have your card info that was “canceled years prior”? Also, NO BANK will allow a charge-back on a closed account. Then you say that he was unaware of the refund issued. Who do you suppose would have to approve such things in the first place?

    4) I seriously doubt that he apologized for his firms incompetence. Isn’t it more likely that a business owner would apologize that they didn’t meet your expectations? Attorneys are fully aware of what they are saying. You may call it semantics, but the truth of the matter is that your twist of what was said would be an admission of guilt and there isn’t a lawyer in the world that would do that.

    5) Which is it; “substantial damages” or “too small”? Just for fun I called a few local attorneys to see if they would take the case. All 3 of them had modest fees that they were willing to add into the suit. If you are truthful and win, you would get those fees back.

    Once more… I am fairly certain that discussing this in a public forum invites Allan to discuss it in the same public forum. Client confidentiality does not mean that you can say anything you want (true or not) while the other parties are silenced.

  • Programmer

    I see…
    You didn’t use Allan S. Lolly. You used a relations attorney. And for some reason you feel the need to post about Allan. I love your article on squidoo. Along with a profile that simply says you registered the same day and only posted one article.
    Love the bio:”Hello world. This is my bio. I can edit it later!”

    So what’s your angle? Are you also Trevor? Your posts elsewhere sure make you sound like you’re Trevor. I find it difficult to believe that you are just a good Samaritan spending this much time trying to protect the public from a company that you never used.

  • Trevor

    There was a “welcome” packet which contained most of the information they needed to proceed, followed by some basic information along the way. I had fedexed the welcome package twice, as well as other needed docs that were requested. These docs were mailed to different agencies (this company apparently changes its name too) between New York and California all to various different paralegals or “case workers”. Who knows where they actually wound up (a different set of worries). Everything was great with my financials for the first year and a half that I had employed this firm. I qualified with flying colors. Had they not delayed and lost docs I would likely be living with my wife in the US now “happily ever after”. Mr. Lolly likely had never even looked at my case or file until well after multiple complaints from my end that it was being mis-handled.

  • Trevor

    Yeah sure have, but thanks for the lead. If you notice on a lot of the sites like this, Allan Lolly answers (very matter-of-fact) each negative complaint (but not praise). It is apparent that all he does is wash his hands of any wrongdoing while blatantly placing the blame directly on the client with an unresolved issue. I am not saying who was right and who was wrong in these issues, I wouldn’t know that, but what I can say is that it is an inappropriate way to handle a customer issue.

  • Markc

    If a company neglected to ask for your account information or to verify that before issuing you a refund then it is their responsibility… not yours. People change payment information all the time. Sounds like they’re covering up a blunder!

  • Epetrova

    What is it that you program if it is not computers? You do not have any knowledge of this yet you speak that Trevor is not telling the truth? Make up your mind. You said you knew something about this but now you say you don’t. Either way you lied.

  • Epetrova

    What you say is wrong. Your numbers do not make sense. Out of 11,000 people only 100 have difficulty receiving visa? I seriously doubt that as accurate.

  • Programmer

    Did you read anything here? Trevor claims that the company DID REFUND HIS MONEY to a bank account that has been closed for years. That’s impossible. Not improbable… impossible.
    ALSO, note what I posted under Mrdocstevens comment.
    The first link posted is a claim that he used the company and tells almost the same story as Trevor.

    P.S. I write programs that are used by computers. Would you call engineers at a nuclear facility electricians? Why do you seem to have such an interest in discrediting me? I’m here pointing out that this entire story is not true and telling you all why. I have no need or desire to lie. Just pay attention to what you’re reading and look at all the inaccuracies and contradictions.

  • Programmer

    And again, I didn’t say that at all. Please re-read what I wrote. There is nothing wrong with what I said.
    I’ll explain it simpler… If you took 11,000 people and told them all to raise their left hand, don’t you think it’s probable that some of them would make a mistake and raise their right hand?

  • Programmer

    Is this pattern you’re referring to regarding how he replies to your posts around the net?
    Oh, don’t forget the one where the guy posted a negative review because Allan couldn’t help him with his income tax issues.

  • Programmer

    So tell me what response should be posted to positive feedback?
    Should Allan run around everywhere posting “Thank You” in reply to each?

  • Epetrova

    I see you really do not know what it is that you are saying.

  • Epetrova

    I think that is the point of Trevor’s comments that is this refund was impossible. You are discrediting yourself I only find it amusing. Explain me how you say the entire story is not true AND you say you know nothing of this case. You don’t know is the truth. I do see the inaccuracies and contradictions in your comments.

    P.S. Your desires are not of my concern.

  • Foreigner4fun

    wow. stay away from this company or they’ll sick their goon squad on ya! what a friggin joke. thanks for the heads up

  • Programmer

    No disrespect intended Epetrova, but I think you may require the help of a translator in order to properly understand exactly what is being said.

    More than once Trevor said that the money was refunded.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DRE2PQRUV3KQXNCHCQBUV4MZGE mx4ever

    Hello programmer ( Allan s.lolly’s defense ). I will come up with my story called, Nightmare of allan s. lolly’s fiancée visa job !
    I’m putting together all of mine and his email messages and extracting out of it the very truth. Will be back shortly.

  • Programmer

    On 2 occasions I previously told Trevor that publicly discussing his case is not going to continue one sided.
    Here are the facts that were not previously made public about this case:

    The essential problem is that Mr. Barzee must return to the U.S. and become employed in order to complete case processing. There was an unfortunate communication breakdown early on. Mr. Barzee blames our office for the breakdown, but we disagree. An audit of the case file reveals the problem.

    Mr. Barzee moved overseas and so no longer was able to meet income guidelines. He had no interest in returning to the U.S. There are only a few ways to qualify financially to immigrate a foreigner to the U.S. In this case, his only option is to return to the U.S. and obtain employment. Even stable earnings of $10 per hour can be enough to meet income guidelines.

    Instead of seeking employment, Mr. Barzee chose to complain about services and demanded a refund. Under the circumstance, there is no way to continue case processing unless Mr. Barzee becomes employed. It was best to agree to the demand for refund and sever ties. A refund was issued by our bookkeeper according to the same manner as payment was made: credit card. The bank accepted the return credit. Services were terminated. Mr. Barzee needs to speak with his bank.

    A comment is made of the fact that three assistants worked on his case, which somehow implies this is a bad thing. There are times when the office must redistribute case loads. Case redistribution is more noticeable for those clients whose cases remain open for many months. It is not unusual for an experienced case manager to fill in temporarily during transition. Communications are logged, so it was easy to audit the case file and identify that the communication breakdown was caused by Mr. Barzee.

  • motoRo

    Hey Trev I read your story and know of what happened and am so glad to see you doing the right thing (btw your 7th paragraph up there is very clear. In my eyes programmer is lol hilarious as his stories change so much, he has zero credibility now). Get these blokes good! Wish ya luck… cheers!

  • Trevor

    Hello everyone, thanks again for all your support on this, it is a tough thing to do to stand up to a big corporation, let alone a law firm. Sorry I have been a bit out of the loop here lately. My work has been keeping me busy and unlike Allen I don’t have someone on staff to handle rebuttals. I am working diligently to spread my experience with this firm across the web. You can now view my story (the same story; contrary to what Programmer wants you to believe) on http://www.RipOffReport.com. My story remains the same as the story above, the truth; nothing more, nothing less. The information is all there and is all very clear.To date, Allan Lolly’s firm has not issued me a refund although they claim they have. I am sure most of you can relate to having closed bank accounts or credit cards that you no longer use…lol. As you can see by now, “Programmer” seems to have difficulty with the truth, as well as keeping his story straight. I applaud him in his efforts to keep himself gainfully employed with Mr. Allan Lolly’s firm. Unfortunately it is brutally apparent that he/she is grasping at straws in an attempt to discredit me and lay the groundwork for a “cover up” of the mistakes that Allan Lolly’s firm, Holmes & Lolly (or whatever their current name) has made. I do not feel that I need to dignify the majority of his silly comments with answers, as one simply need re-read my story and all questions will be answered there.I will strive keep everyone updated as to the status of this case.

  • Programmer

    Yes, please see Trevors “Story” at RipOffReport Where Now He Claims To Be In The United States. So what location works best Trevor? Romania, USA, or maybe Fantasy Island? And you can also review the results of Trevor’s case audit there. The next step is arbitration which will result in completely discrediting Trevor and his “story”. And boy how that story changes.

    Now you decided to change the story again and say he didn’t issue a refund. I’ll bet you wouldn’t want transaction records to surface, now would you?

    How dare you challenge my integrity. There isn’t a person here that can point out a single inconsistency in anything I’ve posted anywhere.

    Your ridiculous assumption that I’m doing this for my employment is completely laughable. I am the CEO of my own corporation. I am very much in demand because of my integrity and previous accomplishments that date back to 1976. I often turn down clients based on their corporate integrity. You should be asking why I’m doing this. I’m doing this because I really despise people that lie about good people.

    As far as discrediting and cover-ups are concerned… Why is it that everything that is true about you, you try to turn around and say about me without anything to back it up?
    FOR EXAMPLE:
    1) I point out your inconsistencies and you say I’m inconsistent without showing any examples.
    2) I point out where your lies are, and you call me a liar without pointing anything out.
    3) I post facts that I back up and you post your assumptions based on what will sway the readers.

    THE FACT IS that you do not address comments because you are unable to without contradicting yourself or twisting your story even more.

  • Programmer

    Please give an example of my inconsistencies.
    Don’t just say it and think that makes it true. Show an example, and prove it.

    For example… His actions disqualified his own immigration case. READ: In Trevor’s 7th paragraph he talks about how he quit his job and moved to Romania.

  • Theshoemann

    Mister Trevor I can not say that I believe nor disbelieve your claims. Mister Programmer I will say the same to you. What I can say however is that this is an inappropriate attempt to resolve a case that is clearly unresolved.

  • Cindy

    BIG CORPORATION : 1
    small unhappy customer : 0

  • Programmer

    It is completely inappropriate but it’s not an attempt to resolve anything. In one of Trevors previous posts he expresses that this is an attempt to tarnish Allan’s reputation and it will continue until he gets more money. He already got a 100% refund as he stated multiple times and only denied once in all this.

    This is extortion for hush-money. Nothing more, nothing less.

  • GiddyupROM

    Getting a job in the US is not a mandatory requirement for obtaining a visa into the US. The same task can be accomplished via assets, other sources of income, or sponsorship to name a few.

  • GiddyupROM

    Additionally, can anyone on here recommend a GOOD visa attorney for everyone? That is good information to know…

  • Viktravman

    This “law firm” Allan Lolly or whoever seems to prey on people that are on a tight budget. Less is not always more. You get what you pay for. Did i leave anything out?

  • Lilmissthang

    I think you’re better off trying to go through the process yourself. You’re less likely to run in to an Allan Lolly and you’ll learn the ropes along the way. There are many forums out there which can help, such as Visa Journey, and the consulates in your areas are usually a safe bet for information too. Hope this helps.

  • Trevor

    Looks like Allan Lolly (or you or one of his other employees) has gone around and began responding to the “positive” feedback on ratepoint and Avvo.

  • lala

    I am actually communicating with ALLan Lolly recently to hire him to process an immigration visa, but I am now changing my mind after reading all these reports!

  • grumpyoldman

    @ Programmer: If you ever played in a band, you would clearly have reached the conclusion that the rest of the band were clueless and all playing the wrong tune – apart from your good self, of course.

  • Brenda

    i don’t understand why this one single complaint is popping up everywhere… it seems very antagonistic and makes me more wary of whoever posted.  it almost seems like a personal vendetta since i’ve gone through reviews for this firm and this particular issue has come up in several blogs.  i understand you have a voice but this just seems unethical.

  • Trevor

    Brenda – If you read through here you will find where I have stated I have posted my experience with this firm. It has been quite some time since I have myself posted anything regarding this firm. I warned people of my issue, and that is that. Very simple. Everyone is free to make their own decisions based on the information they have at hand. If you believe this firm is good for you then that is your decision. Let me ask you a question based on your comments. When you have a bad experience with a company do you tell people about it? Of course you do. When you tell people about it is it because you have a “personal vendetta”? Of course it is not. That is ridiculous. What is “unethical” is the way my wife and I were treated by this firm. I can assure you that if the tables were turned and you were harmed in the way we were you would have no qualms about sharing a story as I have. You would not consider yourself to be unethical by sharing your story. I still wonder what the world has come to when a complaint about a company is met with resistance while praise is never questioned. Good Luck and I hope the best for you.  

blog comments powered by Disqus